12 Angry Men

In 12 Angry Men, a single juror manages to convince the other 11 jurors to reconsider their initial unanimous guilty verdict through a series of tense discussions, revealing personal prejudices and biases, in a murder trial of a young man accused of killing his father.

In Sidney Lumet's gripping courtroom drama "12 Angry Men", a single dissenting juror sparks a heated debate, challenging his peers to question their biases and prejudices, proving that justice isn't always swift but it's worth fighting for. #ClassicCinema #12AngryMen

12 jurors debate a teen's murder case. All but 1 think he's guilty. Through discussions, they uncover prejudices & doubts. Verdict flips to not guilty.

Just watched "12 Angry Men" - an intense courtroom drama where a single dissenting juror tries to convince the others that a boy accused of murder is innocent. It's a gripping exploration of prejudice, justice, and the power of reasonable doubt. A must-watch classic! #12AngryMen #JusticePrevails ‍⚖️

12 Angry Men is a 1957 courtroom drama directed by Sidney Lumet. The film follows the deliberations of a jury tasked with deciding the fate of a young man accused of murdering his father. The jury initially seems convinced of the defendant's guilt, with only one juror, Juror 8, holding out for a not guilty verdict. As the deliberations continue, Juror 8 begins to raise doubts and question the evidence presented, causing the other jurors to re-examine their own biases and prejudices. As tensions rise and tempers flare, the jurors must confront their own personal beliefs and biases in order to reach a unanimous decision. Through intense and emotional discussions, the jurors ultimately come to a surprising and thought-provoking conclusion. 12 Angry Men is a powerful exploration of justice, prejudice, and the power of individual conviction.

• Juror 8: The movie begins with twelve jurors being tasked with deciding the fate of a young man accused of murdering his father. Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, is the only one who initially votes not guilty, causing tension and conflict among the other jurors.
• Juror 1: The foreman of the jury, played by Martin Balsam, tries to maintain order and keep the deliberations on track.
• Juror 2: A meek and easily swayed juror, played by John Fiedler, who initially votes guilty but begins to question his decision as the deliberations continue.
• Juror 3: The main antagonist of the film, played by Lee J. Cobb, who is convinced of the defendant’s guilt and is determined to convince the other jurors to vote guilty as well.
• Juror 4: A rational and analytical juror, played by E.G. Marshall, who initially votes guilty but begins to have doubts as the evidence is examined more closely.
• Juror 5: A young man from the same neighborhood as the defendant, played by Jack Klugman, who provides insight into the realities of living in a rough area and how it may have influenced the defendant’s actions.
• Juror 6: A working-class man, played by Edward Binns, who is initially swayed by Juror 3’s arguments but begins to question his own beliefs as the deliberations continue.
• Juror 7: A salesman, played by Jack Warden, who is more interested in getting the deliberations over with quickly so he can attend a baseball game.
• Juror 9: An elderly man, played by Joseph Sweeney, who is observant and wise, and provides valuable insights and perspectives throughout the deliberations.
• Juror 10: A bigoted and angry man, played by Ed Begley, who is convinced of the defendant’s guilt and makes several prejudiced remarks throughout the film.
• Juror 11: A European immigrant, played by George Voskovec, who brings a different cultural perspective to the deliberations and is often at odds with Juror 10’s prejudiced views.
• Juror 12: A young and impatient advertising executive, played by Robert Webber, who is more interested in discussing his own personal life than the case at hand.

As the deliberations continue, Juror 8 begins to present reasonable doubts about the evidence presented in the case. He argues that the defendant’s alibi may be true and that there are inconsistencies in the testimony of the witnesses. Slowly but surely, he begins to sway the other jurors to his side.

Juror 3, who is the most stubborn and aggressive of the jurors, becomes increasingly agitated as his arguments are challenged. He reveals that he has a strained relationship with his own son, which may be influencing his strong belief in the defendant’s guilt.

As the jurors continue to re-examine the evidence, they begin to uncover more and more inconsistencies and doubts. Juror 9 points out that an old man who testified may not have been able to see the defendant clearly due to his physical limitations. Juror 5 reveals that he has a similar knife to the one used in the murder, which contradicts the prosecution’s claim that the knife was unique.

Juror 8 also conducts a reenactment of the alleged murder, which reveals that the timeline presented by the prosecution may not be accurate. This leads to Juror 8’s biggest breakthrough – the possibility that the defendant may have been innocent all along.

As the jurors continue to deliberate, Juror 3 becomes increasingly irrational and aggressive, eventually breaking down and admitting that he has doubts about the defendant’s guilt. In the end, all twelve jurors vote not guilty, and the defendant is acquitted.

The film ends with the jurors leaving the courthouse, with Juror 8 and Juror 9 sharing a moment of understanding and respect. The film highlights the power of critical thinking, open-mindedness, and the importance of standing up for what is right, even in the face of strong opposition.

In conclusion, 12 Angry Men is a powerful and thought-provoking film that explores themes of justice, prejudice, and the human psyche. Through the interactions of the twelve jurors, the film showcases the complexities of the human mind and the impact of individual perspectives on decision-making. It is a timeless classic that continues to resonate with audiences today.

1. What is the movie 12 Angry Men about?
   
   The movie follows the deliberation process of a jury in a murder trial.
2. Who directed 12 Angry Men?
   
   The movie was directed by Sidney Lumet.
3. When was 12 Angry Men released?
   
   The movie was released in 1957.
4. Is 12 Angry Men based on a true story?
   
   No, it is based on a teleplay by Reginald Rose.
5. Who wrote the screenplay for 12 Angry Men?
   
   Reginald Rose also wrote the screenplay for the movie.
6. Who stars in 12 Angry Men?
   
   The movie stars Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, and Martin Balsam.
7. What is the main theme of 12 Angry Men?
   
   The main theme is the power of persuasion and the importance of critical thinking.
8. Where does 12 Angry Men take place?
   
   The majority of the movie takes place in the jury room.
9. How long is 12 Angry Men?
   
   The movie has a runtime of 96 minutes.
10. What is the significance of the title 12 Angry Men?
    
    The title refers to the 12 jurors who must come to a unanimous decision.
11. What is the outcome of the trial in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The jury ultimately finds the defendant not guilty.
12. What is the setting of 12 Angry Men?
    
    The movie is set in a New York City courthouse.
13. Is 12 Angry Men in color or black and white?
    
    The movie is in black and white.
14. What is the message of 12 Angry Men?
    
    The movie highlights the flaws in the justice system and the importance of individual responsibility.
15. What is the significance of the knife in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The knife is a key piece of evidence in the murder trial.
16. What is the role of the 8th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 8th juror is the protagonist and the main voice of reason in the movie.
17. What is the climax of 12 Angry Men?
    
    The climax is when the 8th juror convinces the other jurors to reconsider their guilty verdict.
18. What is the resolution of 12 Angry Men?
    
    The resolution is when the jury reaches a unanimous not guilty verdict.
19. What is the significance of the fan in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The fan represents the tension and discomfort in the jury room.
20. What is the role of the 3rd juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 3rd juror is the antagonist and the main obstacle to reaching a unanimous decision.
21. What is the role of the 9th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 9th juror is a voice of reason and a key ally to the 8th juror.
22. What is the role of the 12th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 12th juror is initially indecisive but ultimately changes his vote to not guilty.
23. What is the role of the 4th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 4th juror is a logical and analytical thinker who initially votes guilty.
24. What is the role of the 10th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 10th juror is a prejudiced and bigoted character who is the last to change his vote.
25. What is the role of the 11th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 11th juror is a European immigrant who brings a different perspective to the deliberation.
26. What is the role of the 5th juror in 12 Angry Men?
    
    The 5th juror is a man from a similar background as the defendant and initially votes not guilty.